From Observability to Understanding: Automated Incident Triage Using Large Language Model Reasoning Over Logs, Metrics, and Traces
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15662/IJEETR.2023.0505009Keywords:
Automated Incident Triage, AIOps, Large Language Models, Log Analysis, Distributed Tracing, Root Cause Analysis, Observability, Microservices, Reliability EngineeringAbstract
Modern cloud-native and microservice-based systems generate massive volumes of heterogeneous telemetry, including logs, metrics, and distributed traces, as a direct consequence of fine-grained service decomposition, elastic scaling, and geographically distributed deployments. While these signals are indispensable for ensuring availability, performance, and reliability, their velocity, dimensionality, and predominantly unstructured formats routinely overwhelm traditional rule-based incident triage systems and threshold-driven alerting mechanisms. Existing AIOps solutions predominantly rely on statistical anomaly detection or supervised learning models trained on historical failure patterns; although effective for known issues, these approaches struggle to generalize to unseen failure modes, rapidly evolving system topologies, and context-dependent cascading faults that are characteristic of modern production environments. This paper presents an automated incident triage framework that leverages Large Language Model (LLM) reasoning over structured logs, metrics, and distributed traces to address these limitations. Building upon foundational research in distributed tracing, log parsing, and machine learning–based anomaly detection, the proposed framework enables LLMs to semantically interpret multi-modal telemetry, correlate signals across temporal and causal boundaries, and synthesize coherent causal narratives describing system failures. By ranking probable root causes and generating actionable remediation hypotheses in natural language, the framework elevates telemetry analysis from low-level signal detection to high-level operational reasoning. Integrating LLM-based reasoning atop existing observability pipelines allows organizations to preserve proven monitoring infrastructures while substantially reducing mean time to diagnosis (MTTD), improving operator situational awareness, and enhancing the reliability of large-scale distributed systems under dynamic and unpredictable workloads.
References
1. Chandola, V., Banerjee, A., & Kumar, V. (2009). Anomaly detection: A survey. ACM Computing Surveys, 41(3), 1–58.
https://doi.org/10.1145/1541880.1541882
2. Sigelman, B. H., Barroso, L. A., Burrows, M., Stephenson, P., Plakal, M., Beaver, D., Jaspan, S., & Shanbhag, C. (2010). Dapper, a large-scale distributed systems tracing infrastructure. Google Technical Report.
https://research.google.com/pubs/pub36356/
3. Fonseca, R., Porter, G., Katz, R. H., Shenker, S., & Stoica, I. (2007). X-Trace: A pervasive network tracing framework. USENIX NSDI.
https://www.usenix.org/legacy/events/nsdi07/tech/full_papers/fonseca/fonseca.pdf
4. Chen, P., Qi, Z., Zheng, Z., Lyu, M. R., & Chen, S. (2014). CauseInfer: Automatic and distributed performance diagnosis with hierarchical causality graph. IEEE INFOCOM.
https://netman.aiops.org/~peidan/ANM2016/RootCauseAnalysis/ReadingLists/2014INFOCOM_CauseInfer.pdf
5. Du, M., Li, F., Zheng, G., & Srikumar, V. (2017). DeepLog: Anomaly detection and diagnosis from system logs through deep learning. ACM CCS, 1285–1298.
https://doi.org/10.1145/3133956.3134015
6. Kranthi Kumar Routhu. (2018). Seamless HR Finance Interoperability: A Unified Framework through Oracle Integration Cloud. In International Journal of Science, Engineering and Technology (Vol. 6, Number 1). Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17292100
7. He, P., Zhu, J., He, S., Li, J., & Lyu, M. R. (2017). Drain: An online log parsing approach with fixed depth tree. IEEE ICWS, 33–40.
https://doi.org/10.1109/ICWS.2017.13
8. Kranthi Kumar Routhu. (2019). AI-Enhanced Payroll Optimization: Improving Accuracy and Compliance in Oracle HCM. KOS Journal of AIML, Data Science, and Robotics, 1(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17531099
9. Landauer, M., Wurzenberger, M., Skopik, F., Settanni, G., & Filzmoser, P. (2023). Deep Learning for Anomaly Detection in Log Data: A Survey. ACM Computing Surveys.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2207.03820
10. Kranthi Kumar Routhu. (2018). Reusable Integration Frameworks in Oracle HCM: Accelerating Enterprise Automation through Standardized Architecture. In International Journal of Scientific Research & Engineering Trends (Vol. 4, Number 4). Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17670619
11. Ganapathi, A., Kuno, H., Dayal, U., Wiener, J. L., Fox, A., Jordan, M. I., & Patterson, D. A. (2009). Predicting multiple metrics for queries: Better decisions enabled by machine learning. IEEE ICDE.
https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDE.2009.130
12. Nanchari, N. (2020). Remote Patient Monitoring in Healthcare: Leveraging Iot for Continuous Care. In International Journal of Science, Engineering and Technology (Vol. 8, Number 4). Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15791053
13. Xu, W., Huang, L., Fox, A., Patterson, D., & Jordan, M. I. (2009). Detecting large-scale system problems by mining console logs. ACM SOSP.
https://doi.org/10.1145/1629575.1629587
14. Nithin Nanchari. (2020). Wearable IoT Devices for Health. Journal of Scientific and Engineering Research, 7(11), 235–236. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15966018
15. Dean, J., & Barroso, L. A. (2013). The tail at scale. Communications of the ACM, 56(2), 74–80.





