A Reference Architecture for AI-Driven Network Assurance in Large-Scale Enterprise Networks

Authors

  • Manevannan Ramasamy Software Engineering Senior Technical Leader, Milpitas, California, United States of America Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15662/IJEETR.2022.0401006

Keywords:

network assurance, artificial intelligence, AIOps, anomaly detection, root cause analysis, topology, trustworthy AI

Abstract

Network assurance based on AI is becoming one of the most important capabilities for ensuring reliability, performance, and service-level goals in large enterprise network environments. However, automated assurance is a challenge owing to the heterogeneous nature of telemetry, dynamic network structure, time dependencies, and dependence among causes of failures. This is because the proposed AI-based network assurance engine is reliable and comprises streaming telemetry monitoring, semantic normalization, time-aware topological modeling, feature-controlled computation, multi-method feature analysis, evidence-based diagnosis, and control remediation. Observation, inference, action, and decision are well separated in the architecture so that the model prediction cannot be a free operation command. A combination of statistical detection, supervised learning, forecasting, rule-based analysis, and topology-based reasoning detects an anomaly, approximates its impact, categorizes likely root causes, and forecasts a risk underway formation. All assurance findings are linked with supporting observations, state of topology, and time frame, confidence, and data-quality indicators with an evidence layer, contributing to explain ability and audit ability. Even graduated responses are further supported with policy-managed action layer, among more diagnostics and incident creation, and the closed-loop managed and approved remediation with blast-radium limits, verification, and rollback. The architecture proposed has the potential to offer a systematic base of scalable, explainable and operationally trustworthy network assurance besides providing dynamic model testing, drifting and control in dynamic business environments.

15 6

References

1. Clemm et al., Intent Based Networking Concepts and Definitions, RFC 9315, October 2022. https://doi.org/10.17487/RFC9315

2. H. Song et al., Network Telemetry Framework, RFC 9232, May 2022. https://doi.org/10.17487/RFC9232

3. E. Tabassi, Artificial Intelligence Risk Management Framework AI RMF 1.0, NIST AI 100 1, January 2023. https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.AI.100-1

4. Cisco Systems, Cisco Catalyst Assurance User Guide Release 3.3.1, 2026. https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/cloud-systems-management/network-automation-and-management/catalyst-center-assurance/3-3-x/cisco-catalyst-assurance-user-guide-3-3-x/b_cisco_catalyst_assurance_3_2_x_ug_chapter_01.html

5. OpenConfig, gRPC Network Management Interface Specification. https://openconfig.net/docs/gnmi/gnmi-specification/

6. J. O. Kephart and D. M. Chess, The Vision of Autonomic Computing, Computer, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 41 to 50, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2003.1160055

Downloads

Published

2022-01-10

How to Cite

A Reference Architecture for AI-Driven Network Assurance in Large-Scale Enterprise Networks. (2022). International Journal of Engineering & Extended Technologies Research (IJEETR), 4(1), 4336-4346. https://doi.org/10.15662/IJEETR.2022.0401006